I think we are close

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

I think we are close Written by John S2 (5/28/2007 7:33 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Different definitions?, penned by Tracy W

enought to quit on this one. The only thing I would change is to add a modifier to your sentence:

"... I don't think there's any reason to believe that Darcy is capable of being completely reasonable about Elizabeth. ..."

In my mind, it lessens the value of her triumph later on if you leave the modifier out. I don't like to think of Darcy as being completely ruled by his chemistry, so I look for other reasons to help account for his aggitation.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

The Proposal (gasp!) Cathy Allen (5/24/2007 3:30 p.m.)

I still have trouble with the notion... Karen 2L (5/25/2007 6:00 p.m.)
- Mr. Darcy did NOT insult Elizabeth in public Cathy Allen (5/26/2007 12:16 a.m.)
  - Lizzy just had superhuman hearing. nfm nan duval (5/28/2007 4:17 p.m.)
  - I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but Cathy Allen (5/27/2007 11:30 a.m.)
    - Not really... Robbin (5/27/2007 7:31 p.m.)
      - And it's not just Elizabeth's opinion Tracy W (5/27/2007 8:21 p.m.)
        
        CH. 31 Colonel Fitzwilliam says... Moni (5/28/2007 4:41 a.m.)
    - Not quite Line (5/27/2007 2:54 p.m.)
  - Of course he did... Karen 2L (5/26/2007 7:38 p.m.)
  - You are right… Robbin (5/26/2007 6:42 p.m.)
  - By the way John S2 (5/26/2007 6:29 a.m.)
    - John.... JulieW (5/26/2007 7:51 a.m.)
    - No problem discussing material in *previous* chapters - it's the Line (5/26/2007 7:28 a.m.)
      - I think I have it straight now - Thanks. nfm John S2 (5/26/2007 4:38 p.m.)
  - I agree it was not on purpose John S2 (5/26/2007 6:06 a.m.)
    - I cannot agree that Darcy was so shallow to ... Adrian (5/26/2007 12:22 p.m.)
      - Excellent point! John S2 (5/26/2007 4:56 p.m.)
  - He was audible therefore did not care... Helen Halstead (5/26/2007 12:40 a.m.)
    - Yes, and the public nature... Moni (5/26/2007 9:27 a.m.)
- Though I am genreally pro-Darcy, I have to agree with you (nfm) Silvia O (5/25/2007 9:08 p.m.)
Honesty and kindness Line (5/24/2007 6:30 p.m.)
- Not a PERFECT gentleman, Line, I agree, but Cathy Allen (5/25/2007 12:24 p.m.)
  - That quotation... Line (5/25/2007 6:06 p.m.)
    - Ah, good explanation, thanks Line! Makes sense. (nfm) Cathy Allen (5/25/2007 6:51 p.m.)
  - It seems odd for a gentleman like him... John S2 (5/25/2007 5:06 p.m.)
    - Was Darcy's proposal a rational decision? Tracy W (5/26/2007 12:57 a.m.)
      - Darcy is agitated Robbin (5/26/2007 6:55 p.m.)
      - I disagree John S2 (5/26/2007 5:39 p.m.)
      - Good argument. nfm Susan L (5/26/2007 5:17 a.m.)
    - I too don't see Darcy consulting anyone ... Helen Halstead (5/25/2007 7:47 p.m.)
      - I can now offer this evidence   John S2 (5/27/2007 4:30 a.m.)
        
        Are you serious, John?   Helen Halstead (5/28/2007 6:09 a.m.)
        
        How would a second opinion help?   Tracy W (5/27/2007 5:14 p.m.)
        
        Young love   John S2 (5/28/2007 2:16 a.m.)
        
        Darcy's infatuation "winning"   Kathi (5/29/2007 12:15 a.m.)
        
        Different definitions?   Tracy W (5/28/2007 4:40 p.m.)
        
        I think we are close   John S2 (5/28/2007 7:33 p.m.)
        
        Agreed then   Tracy W (5/28/2007 7:51 p.m.)
        
        Yes nfm   John S2 (5/28/2007 8:08 p.m.)
        
        Constant intimacy   Line (5/27/2007 8:24 a.m.)
    - I don't find it odd at all Line (5/25/2007 6:12 p.m.)
      - Good point, Line   Cathy Allen (5/25/2007 6:57 p.m.)
        
        The friendly unavailable Colonel   John S2 (5/25/2007 7:15 p.m.)
        
        It is indeed a line from P&P2...   Karen 2L (5/25/2007 9:18 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo