Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
Interesting post!
Written by Line
(5/27/2007 9:25 a.m.)
in consequence of the missive, I cannot blame myself for having done thus much., penned by Robbin
You're right about his not apologizing for hurting Jane - I thought he had, but all he says is that Elizabeth knows her sister better than he does(!) and that her resentment is "not unreasonable". I'm not sure if Darcy's criticism of the Bennets' behaviour can be called grasping at straws (by JA's standards), since Elizabeth later takes it quite seriously. However, I agree about the *double* standard: Lady Catherine can be severely lacking in good manners, but not the Bennet family, oh no! I can think of two excuses (though not valid reasons!) for this: 1) Darcy is used to Lady Catherine's bad manners, since he has known her all his life, so he doesn't notice them the way he does the Bennets'. 2) I think Wickham was right when he told Elizabeth in ch.16: "[Lady Catherine] has the reputation of being remarkably sensible and clever; but I rather believe she derives part of her abilities from her rank and fortune, part from her authoritative manner, and the rest from the pride of her nephew, who chuses that every one connected with him should have an understanding of the first class." ] Col Fitzwilliam was right about affection between the couple lessening the honor of Darcy’s triumph. I read this the other way round: the stronger the bond between the couple, the *greater* Darcy's triumph in separating them, since it would take more effort, but if they really didn't love each other very much, then his triumph would be less.
|

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
