Yes, thats what commonplace books were for, Line

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Yes, thats what commonplace books were for, Line Written by JulieW (5/1/2007 8:34 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, A more sympathetic view, penned by Line

and tobe scrupulousy fair to our unknown author,we certainly do not know if this lady /girl selected her passages for herself or wrote under somone else's command and taste,but after 120 page of it.....I think even your sympathetic nature migth be wishing for a dash of Austenian irony/fun...;-)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Mary's Commonplace Book JulieW (5/1/2007 5:26 a.m.)

Thoughts on Mary. Mandy N (5/2/2007 4:51 a.m.)
A more sympathetic view Line (5/1/2007 7:13 p.m.)
- Yes, thats what commonplace books were for, Line JulieW (5/1/2007 8:34 p.m.)
  - Let's cut Regency women some slack; they nan duval (5/1/2007 9:44 p.m.)
    - Erm........ JulieW (5/1/2007 10:47 p.m.)
Thanks Julie W Tracy W (5/1/2007 5:04 p.m.)
- IMHO JulieW (5/1/2007 8:44 p.m.)
  - That passage explains the music studies Tracy W (5/1/2007 10:18 p.m.)
    - Yes, JulieW (5/1/2007 10:43 p.m.)
That is FASCINATING; thank you Julie! Cathy Allen (5/1/2007 2:01 p.m.)
- I can make out the following.... Spencer (5/1/2007 6:30 p.m.)
  - How appropriate... judegray (5/1/2007 6:40 p.m.)
    - Right, just arrogant & conceited. nan duval (5/1/2007 9:49 p.m.)
      - Gentle reminder about use of N-F-M messages Laurel (5/2/2007 7:15 a.m.)
        
        Thanks so much! was confused. nfm nan duval (5/2/2007 8:30 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo