| If the Bennets are living up to their family income...
Written by Tracy W
(4/30/2007 4:47 p.m.)
in consequence of the missive, Yes there is, penned by JulieW
... then they would likely go over that income by keeping two sets of horses (one for farm use and one for pleasure). From what you have supplied before, the tax rate was per horse. Furthermore, each additional horse eats, needs shoeing, ties up capital in an asset that may fall over and die at any time, etc. If Mr Bennet exceeds his income and starts building up debt so as to have a separate set of horses for the carriage and the farm, this would cause more inconvenience in the long run than having one set of horses for each purpose.
|