Not necessarily villages ;-)

Not necessarily villages ;-) Written by JulieW (4/29/2007 12:10 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, I think..., penned by Eaffie

A village was, as defined by Dr Johnson in his dictionary ( 1821 edition):

a small collection of houses

:-)

A question Maria Liourdi (4/29/2007 9:51 a.m.)

Map (mentioned in Maria Liourdi's post) Diane Frances (4/29/2007 12:15 p.m.)
- Hello Diane.... JulieW (4/29/2007 12:53 p.m.)
Longbourn etc JulieW (4/29/2007 11:24 a.m.)
- That helps indeed! :-) Maria Liourdi (4/29/2007 4:06 p.m.)
I think... Eaffie (4/29/2007 11:16 a.m.)
- Not necessarily villages ;-) JulieW (4/29/2007 12:10 p.m.)
  - Actually, you answered my question.... Eaffie (4/29/2007 1:49 p.m.)
    - Wow, I had never thought of them all as villages! Mary Ellen (4/29/2007 10:22 p.m.)
      - To break the rule slightly   JulieW (4/30/2007 5:04 a.m.)
        
        Thanks...   Eaffie (4/30/2007 1:39 p.m.)
        
        As we have not met   JulieW (4/30/2007 2:59 p.m.)
  - Estates vs Villages Eaffie (4/29/2007 1:39 p.m.)
    - Question about Longbourne village Lia (4/29/2007 5:30 p.m.)
      - Both, I think Line (4/29/2007 6:05 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -