Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
View thread
|
Previous message
|
Next message
Wouldn't it be "Eliza"? ;-) (nfm)
Written by Line
(2/21/2004 8:35 a.m.)
in consequence of the missive,
On first name acquitance?
, penned by Mandy N
No further message
Future sisters-in-law: what a difference!
kathleen (elder)
(
2/20/2004 6:20 a.m.
)
Good and bad
Nasima
(
2/21/2004 11:39 a.m.
)
Good to see Jane
Tara O'Donnell
(
2/20/2004 9:56 a.m.
)
Indeed!
Emmeline
(
2/20/2004 8:56 a.m.
)
WhenJA writes
JulieW
(
2/20/2004 6:37 a.m.
)
The language used
LaurieC
(
2/21/2004 10:08 a.m.
)
I think she did
Vania
(
2/20/2004 7:32 p.m.
)
But cant you just
JulieW
(
2/21/2004 8:20 a.m.
)
Depends
Vania
(
2/22/2004 2:46 a.m.
)
Which is my point, really........
JulieW
(
2/22/2004 7:03 a.m.
)
On first name acquitance?
Mandy N
(
2/21/2004 1:50 a.m.
)
Wouldn't it be "Eliza"? ;-) (nfm)
Line
(
2/21/2004 8:35 a.m.
)
How can you doubt Miss Bingley? :-p
kathleen (elder)
(
2/20/2004 10:04 a.m.
)
Just imagine the family
JulieW
(
2/20/2004 12:00 p.m.
)
View thread
|
Previous message
|
Next message
Board index