Indeed!

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Indeed! Written by Emmeline (2/20/2004 8:56 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Future sisters-in-law: what a difference!, penned by kathleen (elder)

]"Affectionate and insincere" -- what a marvelous description of Miss Bingley's behaviour toward both her brother & Jane. And I am sure that she will not change; she is all superficiality. Miss Darcy, on the other hand, sincerely loves her brother and wishes to be loved by his wife -- "Four sides of paper were insufficient" so she must have had a lot to say on the matter. (Not shy when it came to writing, perhaps!)

I agree completely with you. :-)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Future sisters-in-law: what a difference! kathleen (elder) (2/20/2004 6:20 a.m.)

Good and bad Nasima (2/21/2004 11:39 a.m.)
Good to see Jane Tara O'Donnell (2/20/2004 9:56 a.m.)
Indeed! Emmeline (2/20/2004 8:56 a.m.)
WhenJA writes JulieW (2/20/2004 6:37 a.m.)
- The language used LaurieC (2/21/2004 10:08 a.m.)
- I think she did Vania (2/20/2004 7:32 p.m.)
  - But cant you just JulieW (2/21/2004 8:20 a.m.)
    - Depends Vania (2/22/2004 2:46 a.m.)
      - Which is my point, really........ JulieW (2/22/2004 7:03 a.m.)
  - On first name acquitance? Mandy N (2/21/2004 1:50 a.m.)
    - Wouldn't it be "Eliza"? ;-) (nfm) Line (2/21/2004 8:35 a.m.)
- How can you doubt Miss Bingley? :-p kathleen (elder) (2/20/2004 10:04 a.m.)
  - Just imagine the family JulieW (2/20/2004 12:00 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo