WhenJA writes

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

WhenJA writes Written by JulieW (2/20/2004 6:37 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Future sisters-in-law: what a difference!, penned by kathleen (elder)

that after Darcy and Elizabeths marraige

"Miss Bingley was very deeply mortified by Darcy's marriage; but as she thought it advisable to retain the right of visiting at Pemberley, she dropt all her resentment; was fonder than ever of Georgiana, almost as attentive to Darcy as heretofore, and paid off every arrear of civility to Elizabeth."

Do you really think she did mangae to pay off every arrear of civility to Elizabeth?

I doubt it myself.....

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Future sisters-in-law: what a difference! kathleen (elder) (2/20/2004 6:20 a.m.)

Good and bad Nasima (2/21/2004 11:39 a.m.)
Good to see Jane Tara O'Donnell (2/20/2004 9:56 a.m.)
Indeed! Emmeline (2/20/2004 8:56 a.m.)
WhenJA writes JulieW (2/20/2004 6:37 a.m.)
- The language used LaurieC (2/21/2004 10:08 a.m.)
- I think she did Vania (2/20/2004 7:32 p.m.)
  - But cant you just JulieW (2/21/2004 8:20 a.m.)
    - Depends Vania (2/22/2004 2:46 a.m.)
      - Which is my point, really........ JulieW (2/22/2004 7:03 a.m.)
  - On first name acquitance? Mandy N (2/21/2004 1:50 a.m.)
    - Wouldn't it be "Eliza"? ;-) (nfm) Line (2/21/2004 8:35 a.m.)
- How can you doubt Miss Bingley? :-p kathleen (elder) (2/20/2004 10:04 a.m.)
  - Just imagine the family JulieW (2/20/2004 12:00 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo