Not all that innocent

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Not all that innocent Written by Kathi (2/8/2004 6:58 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Darcy is innocent, penned by Nasima

] As you see it is Elizabeth's thinking and attributing, it is not at all what JA means. Here ,IMHO, JA showes us what Lizzy thought about Darcy and how she had analyzed the whole matter of separating her sister from Bingley.

I don't think ill of Darcy and I will not do that at all, I will always find excuses for him ;-)

I can see that. ;-) However, I am afraid that this is the narrator's information, no Lizzy's speculation. It includes information Lizzy could not know: "Not a syllable had ever reached [Miss Bingley] of Miss Darcy's meditated elopement. To no creature had it been revealed, where secresy was possible." It is also stated with certainty, which Lizzy's specution could hot have had.

Even Darcy admitted in his letter that he had mixed motives.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Your sister can't have him. I want him for my sister! Allison Jo (2/8/2004 2:36 p.m.)

Big Brother Ann2 (2/8/2004 3:26 p.m.)
Darcy is innocent Nasima (2/8/2004 3:36 p.m.)
- Hmm, I read it differently kathleen (elder) (2/8/2004 4:08 p.m.)
  - Another interpretation... Mandy N (2/8/2004 5:05 p.m.)
    - I quite agree that there is no attachment kathleen (elder) (2/8/2004 5:28 p.m.)
      - Darcy behind the scenes Line (2/8/2004 5:38 p.m.)
    - Did you find it? Kathi (2/8/2004 8:12 p.m.)
      - Don't be harsh on him   Nasima (2/9/2004 2:34 a.m.)
        
        Why not?   Kathi (2/9/2004 3:14 a.m.)
        
        Never   Nasima (2/9/2004 4:12 a.m.)
        
        Lizzy's speculation?   Kathi (2/9/2004 5:01 a.m.)
        
        I agree and Oops!   Ramya (2/9/2004 5:24 a.m.)
        
        Darcy's intentions(long!)   Ramya (2/9/2004 5:20 a.m.)
        
        Good explanation, thanks, Ramya! nfm   Kathi (2/9/2004 5:26 a.m.)
      - Ohh yes, ...eventually! Mandy N (2/9/2004 10:57 a.m.)
        
        You can also check... Line (2/9/2004 6:55 p.m.)
  - I agree! Line (2/8/2004 5:27 p.m.)
    - Good analysis... Mandy N (2/10/2004 5:43 a.m.)
- He's innocent, but Emmeline (2/8/2004 5:08 p.m.)
- Not all that innocent Kathi (2/8/2004 6:58 p.m.)
Darcy's mixed motives Kathi (2/8/2004 7:56 p.m.)
Ranks Linden (2/9/2004 3:14 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo