Re: Foreshadowing

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Re: Foreshadowing Written by kathleen (elder) (1/11/2004 9:11 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, several unrelated questions:, penned by Elizabeth S.

] Logistically speaking, in terms of this group read, may one discuss foreshadowing of future events or must one wait to refer back to them when the actual event takes place. I do not wish to post an inappropriate comment.

The preference would be to refer back when the actual event takes place. That will make it easier to avoid discussing events that occur after the current week's reading/watching. Thanks. :-)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

several unrelated questions: Elizabeth S. (1/11/2004 8:33 p.m.)

Too big a social circle Heather G (1/12/2004 1:01 a.m.)
Cutting Caroline Bingley Tara O'Donnell (1/11/2004 9:11 p.m.)
- Darcy's response V. Jones (1/11/2004 9:36 p.m.)
  - But he isn't really describing Elizabeth Chandra S (1/12/2004 12:54 p.m.)
  - New to Pemberley? Myretta (1/12/2004 12:09 p.m.)
Re: Foreshadowing kathleen (elder) (1/11/2004 9:11 p.m.)
Four and Twenty Families Mary Frances 2 (1/11/2004 9:01 p.m.)
Society families and Sir William Lucas Diana (1/11/2004 8:52 p.m.)
- Not Sir William's breeding; Mrs. Bennet's manners Lucy Jean (1/12/2004 2:28 a.m.)
  - Yes, but she was right KateL (1/12/2004 5:22 a.m.)
    - 'right' Emmeline (1/12/2004 8:50 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo