Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Another Question   Written by BarbaraB (1/29/2004 9:13 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Second sons and money, penned by JulieW
Are you new?

This is all very fascinating and I would like to pose another question.

]But I agree, that when compared with the inheritacen of the eldest son, the younger son's portion may have seemed paltry;but then the operation of primogentiure ( the rule that the eldest son inherits the majority of his father's estate)was by its very nature arbitary.

Were parents stricly bound by law to pass their estates and the bulk of the money if they saw that the eldest was irresponsible and was likely to fritter away the family funds? Oh, I just now thought about S&S and how Robert was given his brother's inheritance so I guess not. Was this something that could be done easily or was this an unusual case? Love the information you give to these questions. :-)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast