Four and Twenty Families

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Four and Twenty Families Written by Mary Frances 2 (1/11/2004 9:01 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, several unrelated questions:, penned by Elizabeth S.

I thought that the reason this comment was so out of place was that Mrs. Bennet had completely missed what the preceding conversation was about. Mr. Darcy had been referring to the fact that there was not a wide variety of types of people in the country and Mrs. Bennet could only relate to this in terms of quantity. Also, the fact that she had apparently counted the number of families did not show good breeding, in my opinion.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

several unrelated questions: Elizabeth S. (1/11/2004 8:33 p.m.)

Too big a social circle Heather G (1/12/2004 1:01 a.m.)
Cutting Caroline Bingley Tara O'Donnell (1/11/2004 9:11 p.m.)
- Darcy's response V. Jones (1/11/2004 9:36 p.m.)
  - But he isn't really describing Elizabeth Chandra S (1/12/2004 12:54 p.m.)
  - New to Pemberley? Myretta (1/12/2004 12:09 p.m.)
Re: Foreshadowing kathleen (elder) (1/11/2004 9:11 p.m.)
Four and Twenty Families Mary Frances 2 (1/11/2004 9:01 p.m.)
Society families and Sir William Lucas Diana (1/11/2004 8:52 p.m.)
- Not Sir William's breeding; Mrs. Bennet's manners Lucy Jean (1/12/2004 2:28 a.m.)
  - Yes, but she was right KateL (1/12/2004 5:22 a.m.)
    - 'right' Emmeline (1/12/2004 8:50 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo