Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Second sons...   Written by Mandy N (1/29/2004 1:37 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Elizabeth's tender feelings for Colonel Fitzwilliam, penned by kathleen (elder)
Are you new?

I agree if Lizzy had to marry a man she didn't love but respected and felt affection for, Colonel Fitzwilliam would have been a good choice for her. Now I am aware how the eldest son inherited everything and younger sons received nothing and this enabled great estates to remain intact so they were not divided up smaller. But I'd like a different perspective. Now, Colonel Fitzwilliam makes it clear to Lizzy he cannot marry her as he has no money. Although merely second son of an Earl, couldn't he even ask for money to get married? Could he expect money or a small house fom his father's will or nothing? Or were such 'particulars' differently arranged in families? What an irony the Hon. Colonel Fitzwilliam is virtually penniless yet he was probably of higher social rank than Darcy who was so wealthy. I wonder if JA intended any social commentary here?


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast