Clarify

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Clarify Written by Stephanie (10/30/2011 10:25 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, no engagement, penned by Nikki N

I apologize for being unclear. I meant that Capt. Wentwortth did not instantly contradict his affection for Louisa. I never assumed he would let a non-existent engagement stand uncontested.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

The age of thinking seriously Tom P2 (10/25/2011 6:53 p.m.)

Thinking seriously. Rachel G (10/26/2011 8:27 a.m.)
- Sundays and more: bad habits indeed! Kathryn Ann (10/28/2011 12:16 p.m.)
  - The Rules - Regency style. Rachel G (10/28/2011 6:41 p.m.)
    - I'll go even further than Nikki, ... gianni (10/29/2011 7:12 p.m.)
      - Frederick's intentions. Rachel G (10/29/2011 9:30 p.m.)
    - fully intended? Nikki N (10/28/2011 8:17 p.m.)
      - a doubt   Stephanie (10/30/2011 12:03 a.m.)
        
        no engagement   Nikki N (10/30/2011 3:17 a.m.)
        
        Clarify   Stephanie (10/30/2011 10:25 p.m.)
        
        No, Stephanie, ...   gianni (10/30/2011 1:13 a.m.)
    - I was thinking that too Amytat (10/28/2011 6:46 p.m.)
seriousness Stephanie (10/25/2011 8:50 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo