Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


no engagement   Written by Nikki N (10/30/2011 3:17 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, a doubt, penned by Stephanie
Are you new?

I believe Fred did contradict Capt Harville's assumption (that he and Louisa were engaged) aloud. It was also the proper thing to do, since he and Louisa were really not engaged. Even if a gentleman was intending to ask a lady to marry him, but had not yet proposed, and his friend assumed they were already engaged and said so, he had to tell his friend they were not, (or at least not yet, but that he hoped she would accept him). To let an engagement be assumed where there is none would be unfair on the lady, since she might not accept him. It could also unfairly keep other suitors away from the lady. I don't believe Capt benwick wold have gone ahead with courting Louisa if he thought that she and Fred were engaged, he would have been too honourable to his friend to do so.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast