Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


How about another layer of subversiveness, then?   Written by Tom P2 (10/12/2011 11:41 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, This occurred to me too, penned by BarbaraB
Are you new?

Is it conceivable that JA is expounding a school of thought without endorsing it? She slips so readily between the narrator's voice and characters' internal voices, that she could equally well slip into a point of view of conventional taste. When people flock together on some matter of taste, without really thinking for themselves, they become a target for JA's wit. We see it in S+S* and NA** and MP***, so perhaps that's what she's up to here, too? Exposing the 'you can only grieve properly if you're willowy' school of thought to ridicule, by showing it starkly?

*when Lady Middleton thinks ill of the Miss Dashwoods for being 'satirical', without knowing what it means

**when a prescriptive taste allows Catherine Morland to dismiss all(!) of Bath as un-picturesque

***when a prescriptive taste is fatal for the avenue at Sotherton


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast