Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
Hmm ...
Written by gianni
(10/10/2011 2:05 a.m.)
in consequence of the missive, An obliging landlord??, penned by Rachel G
... I'd always assumed from this comment that Lady R was a tenant of Sir Walter's, but you've raised the doubt,now, which is reinforced by the consideration that Sir Russell was rich; why would he endure being a tenant even of a baronet?
But I see that my original thought is the more popular, and Rae has made a telling comment in its favor. Now I'm inclined to swing back to the popular view. Shucks! :-) |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
