Ah-ha!

Ah-ha! Written by Rachel G (10/9/2011 5:31 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, An obliging landlord??, penned by Rachel G

It had not occurred to me that Sir Walter could be Lady Russell's landlord. Am I missing something in the text?

It is a good idea though, and makes perfect sense of LR's comment.
Thanks all for your observations.

An obliging landlord?? Rachel G (10/8/2011 7:57 p.m.)

Hmm ... gianni (10/10/2011 2:05 a.m.)
- tenant Nikki N (10/10/2011 4:11 a.m.)
  - Fine point, Nikki! Thanks nfm gianni (10/10/2011 11:21 a.m.)
Ah-ha! Rachel G (10/9/2011 5:31 a.m.)
- Estate village Robbin (10/9/2011 9:28 a.m.)
  - Thanks. Rachel G (10/9/2011 1:04 p.m.)
    - Kellynch Lodge Rae (10/9/2011 3:01 p.m.)
      - Good points. I'm convinced! nfm Rachel G (10/9/2011 4:47 p.m.)
Perhaps he was an obliging landlord to her Ramya (10/8/2011 9:44 p.m.)
- Sir W as Landlord Bridget D (10/9/2011 3:58 a.m.)
- Agree Cheryl (10/8/2011 10:04 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -