Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
JA is not her characters and the "invisible servants"
Written by Jenny Allan
(10/25/2005 6:29 p.m.)
in consequence of the missive, Snobbery again, penned by Line
Yet, Anne for her liberality doesn't take notice of servants. Line has pointed out many, many instances of invisible servants in Austen. This is a reflection of her class and time and place, I believe. When servants do have a face and name and character in Austen, they are still very servile to the needs of the main characters in the novel. Mrs. Reynold's gives us vital information about Darcy in P&P. Thomas' trip into town in S&S yields a frightful piece of news for Elinor. Serle and James allow Mr. Woodhouse to exhibit some of his more famous quirks in Emma. Badley the Butler unwittingly weilds a blow to Mrs. Norris' ego in MP and Maria Rushworth's adultery is brought to light by a maid. In the same novel, Betsey, Mrs. Price nemesis, provides some much needed comic relief and she tells us more about Mrs. Price's character than she does of herself. None of these servants would exist in the novel without a larger reason. There isn't a servant who has any knd of independent character or whose interests are fulfilled or addressed in any deep way in Austen. And then there are the scores of invisible servants who run the houses, cook the meals, care for the babies, etc., etc in all of Austen's work. They might as well be part of the furniture. |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
