I was not thinking

I was not thinking Written by Robbin (10/22/2005 3:51 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Agree also, penned by Tracy W

of a time thing, just that LR never has been seen to be interested in them before so why now.

Lady R's Dishonesty BarbaraB (10/21/2005 7:13 p.m.)

DH was positive LR saw CW, and I was... Mary Ellen (10/24/2005 2:06 p.m.)
Very human response Jenny Allan (10/24/2005 12:04 p.m.)
My Reasons For Believing LR Saw FW BarbaraB (10/22/2005 9:39 p.m.)
- Well done... Robbin (10/23/2005 10:46 a.m.)
  - Overlook - could go both ways Line (10/23/2005 4:35 p.m.)
    - Third definition is perfect...for me! :) Robbin (10/23/2005 6:52 p.m.)
Lady R Emmeline (10/22/2005 6:25 a.m.)
But did she see him? Cheryl (10/21/2005 7:29 p.m.)
- Pity and Disdain Robbin (10/22/2005 1:54 a.m.)
- I am not so ready to acquit Barbara (10/21/2005 8:41 p.m.)
  - All true, however... Cheryl (10/22/2005 10:15 a.m.)
  - Me neither Ramya (10/22/2005 12:50 a.m.)
- Agree with Cheryl Lia (10/21/2005 8:08 p.m.)
  - Agree also Tracy W (10/22/2005 3:46 p.m.)
    - I was not thinking Robbin (10/22/2005 3:51 p.m.)
  - I'm with Cheryl and Lia... Delories (10/22/2005 9:51 a.m.)
    - Just so Line (10/22/2005 2:03 p.m.)
      - Overlooked Robbin (10/22/2005 3:57 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -