Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Yes, however,   Written by Kim in AK (10/5/2005 8:16 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Would not have married until had fortune, penned by Tracy W
Are you new?

I am convinced that the original plan was still to marry immediately--until Sir Walter announced that he would not give Anne her portion. At that point, it was obvious they could not marry, since CW had saved absolutely nothing of his prize money, and had no promise of even getting a ship. Anne's portion of either 10,000 split 3 ways or 10,000 total (however we read that; I tend to read it as 10,000 for Anne) would have been enough, I believe, in their eyes to justify immediate marriage. Anne has already stated that if CW still wanted to marry her, she fully expected he would have returned to do so once he earned his first few thousand soon after.


I'm thinking that in LR's eyes, and in eyes of the Elliots, this would not have been much to justify a marriage.

So, here's what I'm saying: they think "Hey, we've got a dowry of 10,000; what's to stop us?" Then, when Anne realizes that they have absolutely NO money, and not much of a prospect of getting any, she allows herself to be convinced that they are being foolish and ridiculous.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast