Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
I agree with both your posts, Line
Written by Joan Ellen
(9/23/2005 12:28 p.m.)
in consequence of the missive, People in love..., penned by Line
If JA's novels are at all a reflection of reality in this respect, we have some examples: In MP we have Aunt Norris encouraging Maria to marry Rushworth (to which I have no doubt Maria would have objected had she not had the same end in view herself), and everyone encouraging if not browbeating Fanny to marry Crawford. In S&S, Elinor warns Marianne to be more cautious with Willoughby, and Sir John & Mrs Jennings consider the love affairs of the Miss Dashwoods fair game for sport and speculation. In Emma, Knightley warns Emma about Frank Churchill, asking if she is sure she understands his relationship to Jane Fairfax. In P&P, Elizabeth pays no attention to her mother's insistence that she marry Mr Collins, but she is greatly distressed by her father's objections to her marrying Darcy - though SHE is able to persuade HIM in the end. She ignores Caroline Bingley's warning about Wickham, but is much more open to her Aunt Gardiner's caution about the same gentleman. As this is cited as 'a wonderful instance of advice being given on such a point without being resented', however, one might conclude rebellion was not uncommon. Nowadays we tend to view marriage as a private matter between two people, or involving at most their immediate families; most of us would be reluctant to offer unsolicited advice on such a subject to anyone for fear it would be resented. But I have a general impression that marriage back then was viewed more as something of concern to the entire community or circle of society to which a couple belonged. |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
