Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


I can't answer the second question.   Written by Julie P. (9/23/2005 6:48 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, The Lady Russell Question -- a Question, penned by Annette J.
Are you new?

But I can answer the first. You and I seem to be about the same "vintage," and looking back, I absolutely understand why Lady Russell did what she did. Anne could not have gone out and got a job to support herself and any children, there were no social welfare programs, and, since her father did not like the marriage, I'm pretty certain he would not have taken her in if her husband either died or was wounded in action.

Lady Russell was 100% correct to be prudent. Life was hard back then, even for the rich, and she knew it. It's sad that such a lovely girl as Anne was unable to marry the man she loved at the age of 19, but who knows if Frederick's character would have changed the way it did if they'd married at such a young age? We have the benefits of 20/20 hindsight. Lady Russell did not.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast