Probably a mistake...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Probably a mistake... Written by Vicki (9/21/2005 1:09 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Revision?, penned by Lia

My copy (Oxford Illustrated Jane Austen) has a note that says "1800 should probably be 1801". So it's probably just a mistake that Austen didn't have time to revise. I'm looking forward to hearing about the revisions Austen might have made if she'd had more time.

(By the way, this is my first post in a Group Read.)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Dates (and math). Lia (9/20/2005 1:58 p.m.)

Nitpicks united Ann2 (9/20/2005 5:25 p.m.)
- Revision? Lia (9/20/2005 7:25 p.m.)
  - Or no time to revise? Barbara (9/21/2005 12:04 a.m.)
    - Persuasion is too short? Chris DS (9/21/2005 5:24 a.m.)
    - Oh , Barbara! You are so right Ann2 (9/21/2005 4:47 p.m.)
      - Oh, I understood the opposite...   Line (9/22/2005 8:19 a.m.)
        
        Not known for sure.   Barbara (9/22/2005 10:59 a.m.)
        
        Just deduction. What made me ...   Ann2 (9/22/2005 3:42 p.m.)
    - I'll be curious... Lia (9/21/2005 7:03 p.m.)
  - "..or reckon time, with feminine lawlessness..." Chris DS (9/21/2005 12:24 a.m.)
  - Probably a mistake... Vicki (9/21/2005 1:09 p.m.)
    - Welcome aboard! -nfm- Maisy (9/21/2005 2:42 p.m.)
Could be... LissaB (9/20/2005 8:26 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo