Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


I think it is a bit of both. It would be more expensive   Written by Annette J. (9/19/2005 7:20 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, my assumption while reading, penned by Rebecca Nix
Are you new?

to live in London and there were more temptations as well. Bath must have been much cheaper or there would be no point in going there to "retrench." Also, I think that the fact that it is smaller in population would mean that there are few secrets, so Sir Walter could not indulge in "sins of the flesh," for example, or gamble (if that were something that appealed to him) without it being brought to someone's attention.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast