Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Unreasonably discontented?   Written by Robbin (9/19/2005 2:31 p.m.)
Are you new?

Volume One, Chapter One.

“That Lady Russell, of steady age and character, and extremely well provided for, should have no thought of a second marriage, needs no apology to the public, which is rather apt to be unreasonably discontented when a woman does marry again, than when she does not.”

Why are people to be unreasonably discontented? Is this because there are many more eligible ladies to be married than there are gentlemen of consequence to marry them? Is it frowned upon for a lady to have more than one opportunity of happiness in the marriage state? Was it considered disrespectful to the deceased husband for a lady to remarry? Any thoughts?


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast