He/she must have thought that didn't need explaning nfm

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

He/she must have thought that didn't need explaning nfm Written by Kathleen Glancy (5/13/2010 5:35 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, And how did he/she explained, penned by Graciela

No further message

Compliment or insult - a questionable annotation Kathleen Glancy (5/11/2010 2:41 p.m.)

I think it refers to Darcy also Connie (5/11/2010 9:12 p.m.)
- I have routinely doubted "experts" Kathleen Glancy (5/12/2010 2:50 p.m.)
  - And how did he/she explained Graciela (5/13/2010 3:32 p.m.)
    - He/she must have thought that didn't need explaning nfm Kathleen Glancy (5/13/2010 5:35 p.m.)
  - Good heavens! You think she would be an ACTRESS?!?!?! nfm Stephanie (5/12/2010 3:47 p.m.)
    - You too are more pure-minded than I am nfm Kathleen Glancy (5/13/2010 3:06 p.m.)
I also thought it referred to Darcy, but... Benedicte (5/11/2010 4:16 p.m.)
I took it to reference Darcy's info. nfm Stephanie (5/11/2010 2:58 p.m.)
- I took it to refer to Wickham, and that... Line (5/11/2010 3:24 p.m.)
  - I also thought it referred to Wickham Lou C (5/12/2010 6:30 a.m.)
  - But Mr Gardiner, in his final line Kathleen Glancy (5/11/2010 3:54 p.m.)
    - She related the particulars of all the pecuniary transactions Frances G (5/11/2010 11:32 p.m.)
      - definitely - referred to Darcy Karen G (5/12/2010 4:53 p.m.)
    - I assumed also that it refers to Darcy Anne-Marie (5/11/2010 5:34 p.m.)
      - nothing but the belief of your being a party concerned Stephanie (5/11/2010 9:43 p.m.)
        
        Almost you (all) begin to persuade me... ;-) (nfm) Line (5/13/2010 12:51 p.m.)

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index