Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
I agree with Stephanie's interpretation of this sentence.
Written by Connie
(5/12/2010 1:00 p.m.)
in consequence of the missive, Darcy's mistake was also to ..., penned by Kathi
I think the residents of Meryton, etc. interpreted his behavior as being snobbish, but are we ever told by Darcy or the ON that it was? I might have forgotten something. If not, I still think it is open to interpretation. As I have written elsewhere, I think Darcy thought the behavior commonly required at a ball was beneath him--not necessarily the people in attendance. We are told he was continually giving offense, so I don't think the Meryton crowd was being treated differently than most other assemblies of strangers. IMHO, he saw such behavior as being vain and encouraging others to be vain. He was not a conversationalist, he knew none of the people beyond his own party, so if others expected him to dance, make small talk, etc.--too bad! He wasn't there for their pleasure! Why should his behavior depend on other people's expectations of him? He was a gentleman, and that should speak for itself. (The irony, of course, if this was his thinking, is that it caused him to act throughout the novel in an ungentlemanly way, as Lizzy pointedly said at the proposal.) |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
