Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


motivations for an entail   Written by Heather Leigh (4/29/2010 4:52 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Why would Sir Lewis's property go to Darcy?, penned by kathleen (elder)
Are you new?

This is an interesting topic and unfortunately I don't think P&P gives us enough information to satisfy our curiosity...

I am intrigued by Lady Catherine's statement which makes it clear that an entail was a strategy that a land-owning family could use if they thought it necessary:

"I see no occasion for entailing estates from the female line. It was not thought necessary in Sir Lewis de Bourgh's family."

We don't know when Longbourn was entailed (was it Mr. Bennett's father's decision, or an earlier generation?) or why. Maybe to prevent its passing to a daughter and her present/future husband, maybe to prevent its being divided up and sold off in parcels? Austen doesn't give us information to understand the entail much better than Mrs. Bennett does ;-)

It's ironic, given this legal strategy for keeping the family estate from being fragmented, that Mr. Bennett was estranged from at least one of his male relatives (the older Mr. Collins). Guess it's easier to keep property united than people!


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast