I meant...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

I meant... Written by Tom P2 (4/25/2010 9:11 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Just one man's word, penned by Kathi

I meant that the two conflicting stories (or hints of stories) are traceable to just one man each: Mr Wickham and Mr Darcy, discounting Mr Bingley's hearsay as you do.

I agree that Elizabeth did a good (rigorous) job of processing Miss Bingley's statements. That's part of what contrasts with her indulgence of Mr Wickham.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

ch 16 Wickham smashes Darcy... Akaruihi (4/24/2010 10:35 a.m.)

...and Elizabeth judges unequally in her... what? Infatuation? Tom P2 (4/25/2010 6:51 a.m.)
- Just one man's word Kathi (4/25/2010 8:33 p.m.)
  - I meant... Tom P2 (4/25/2010 9:11 p.m.)
ch 18: Darcy makes no answer. Akaruihi (4/24/2010 10:39 a.m.)
- Does Darcy know OlgaI (4/24/2010 10:41 a.m.)
  - Hmm...to me yes. Akaruihi (4/24/2010 10:46 a.m.)
    - It s very vague OlgaI (4/24/2010 10:53 a.m.)
      - agreed. it´s vague- Akaruihi (4/25/2010 12:33 p.m.)
      - Explains the "Lost Forever" Quote Lenora (4/24/2010 1:50 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo