It s very vague

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

It s very vague Written by OlgaI (4/24/2010 10:53 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Hmm...to me yes., penned by Akaruihi

from this conversation we must conclude that Darcy agrees that Wickham has lost his friendship forever and has no intenton to explain why but places the blame of that on Wickham.

I think this scene is given slightly more from Elizabeth's POV...

Previous message | Next message | Board index

ch 16 Wickham smashes Darcy... Akaruihi (4/24/2010 10:35 a.m.)

ch 18: Darcy makes no answer. Akaruihi (4/24/2010 10:39 a.m.)
- Does Darcy know OlgaI (4/24/2010 10:41 a.m.)
  - Hmm...to me yes. Akaruihi (4/24/2010 10:46 a.m.)
    - It s very vague OlgaI (4/24/2010 10:53 a.m.)
      - Explains the "Lost Forever" Quote Lenora (4/24/2010 1:50 p.m.)
      - agreed. it´s vague- Akaruihi (4/25/2010 12:33 p.m.)
...and Elizabeth judges unequally in her... what? Infatuation? Tom P2 (4/25/2010 6:51 a.m.)
- Just one man's word Kathi (4/25/2010 8:33 p.m.)
  - I meant... Tom P2 (4/25/2010 9:11 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo