Stupid did not necessarily have the same meaning...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Stupid did not necessarily have the same meaning... Written by Christopher (4/21/2010 4:09 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Same with "stupid", penned by CarolTS

...then as it does now. The first definition in Johnson's 1828 dictionary is: "Dull".

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Mr. Darcy may hug himself Jeannine K (4/16/2010 12:32 p.m.)

Thank you for the explanation (nfm) Jeannine K (4/18/2010 10:47 a.m.)
From Johnson's dictionary, 1828 Graciela (4/16/2010 11:52 p.m.)
- Fun to Find "Hug" Used in Regency England Lenora (4/21/2010 12:20 p.m.)
  - Same with "stupid" CarolTS (4/21/2010 2:18 p.m.)
    - Stupid did not necessarily have the same meaning... Christopher (4/21/2010 4:09 p.m.)
      - Neither did "hug" nfm   CarolTS (4/22/2010 12:32 a.m.)
        
        "Hug" not the same meaning?   Graciela (4/22/2010 2:13 a.m.)
        
        Their table was superlatively stupid.   Stephanie (4/22/2010 2:50 p.m.)
Darcy may congratulate himself (so to speak)... Adrian (4/16/2010 12:35 p.m.)
- Like "patting himself on the back" kathleen (elder) (4/16/2010 8:09 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo