Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


My point   Written by Barbara (4/20/2010 1:05 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, We need to distinguish, penned by Adrian
Are you new?

It is possible to object to someone on romantic principle and still have that principle be valid.

It is not wrong for Elizabeth to object to Mr. Collins on the basis that she knows she could never even respect him, let alone love him, because she is objecting to real aspects of his character that are not going to go away, improve, or be possible to overlook.

I agree that for Charlotte, these objections do not hold weight compared to the prospect of a secure home and not to be dependant on her parents and brothers forever, but it does not mean that the objections are not valid, all the same.

Someone like Marianne, though, was objecting on romantic principle that was not really valid, based on superficial details--and she realized this herself later.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast