Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Never really knew Charlotte   Written by Barbara (4/20/2010 12:28 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Dissapointment and age, penned by B. Michelle
Are you new?

This is the part that bothers me. Elizabeth feels shocked that Charlotte would accept his proposal and that she never really knew her friend, but perhaps she should have known her friend better. Elizabeth assumes her friend thinks and feels as she does, but IMO Charlotte has made it pretty clear that she doesn't and never did.

In Ch. 18, Charlotte showed that she thinks it appropriate to separate your feelings from your behaviour, especially if an eligible man is in your sights: "Charlotte could not help cautioning [Elizabeth] in a whisper not to be a simpleton, and allow her fancy for Wickham to make her appear unpleasant in the eyes of a man of ten times his consequence."

Back in Ch. 6, Charlotte weighed in on how she thought Jane should act towards Mr. Bingley: "In nine cases out of ten a woman had better show more affection than she feels...Jane should therefore make the most of every half-hour in which she can command his attention. When she is secure of him, there will be leisure for falling in love as much as she chuses."

Elizabeth counters that it's all fine if all you're after is a husband or if a woman has designs on someone without any feelings for him. When Charlotte answers that "Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance. ... and it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life," Elizabeth laughs and says
"You make me laugh, Charlotte; but it is not sound. You know it is not sound, and that you would never act in this way yourself."

It's telling that Charlotte never answered that remark. Elizabeth laughed it off, but it's pretty clear that this is exactly how Charlotte planned to act, intended to act and actually did act.

I'm surprised that Elizabeth was surprised at how Charlotte acted, because the signs were always there. Consdering that she should have known how such a close friend felt (because it had never been concealed from her) and was likely to act, I think Elizabeth is in the wrong for being so shocked by her friend's behaviour. She may not agree with it or like it, but it certainly should not have come as a surprise to her.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast