Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Oh I think so!   Written by Merrie B. (4/18/2010 9:24 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Interesting thought. Probably., penned by nan duval
Are you new?

I think it would definitely make a difference!! I've heard about studies on younger children (very young...under 3 years old) where it has been shown that while they are unhappy anytime the mother is away (working, etc.) they can tell (and are less unhappy) if it is because the mother is forced by circumstances to be away. If she CHOOSES to go away, the child can sense it somehow, and deep down, instinctively feels a sense of neglect or unwantedness, even if they don't recognize it on the surface.


I think something similar could be the case here...if the father were away from home, the child would recognize that they COULDN'T be with him, but if he were neglecting them while at home, they would feel as if he didn't WANT to be with them. Which would, imo, have a negative impact.
Hope all that made sense. :P


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast