Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Of course!   Written by gianni (4/13/2010 2:29 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Of the dangers of dictionaries, penned by Anselm
Are you new?

You've given me a new perspective on wordplay in Austen. I've long known that many English words have deviated from their French and German antecedents that made perfect sense in the old languages, but whose present definitions seem unrelated, even though lexically nearly identical.

"envelop" -- fold, cover, conceal. Still has for us the same meaning.

"develop" -- unfold, uncover, reveal. The accepted modern definition bears no resemblance at all to that of "envelop", or to this definition of "develop".

I'll be watching for more of this. Thanks very much!


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast