Lisa

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Lisa Written by Laraine (4/13/2010 9:08 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, misjudgement, penned by LisaS

Are you new?

No spoilers means avoiding "we shall see" lines too. If you can't make the point without hinting at future events, please wait to make the point.

We'll have to delete hints as well as direct references in future.

Thanks,
Laraine

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Lizzy not that great in understanding people Christopher (4/12/2010 1:55 p.m.)

This is a whole can of worms in itself! :-) Line (4/12/2010 2:15 p.m.)
- misjudgement LisaS (4/12/2010 7:05 p.m.)
  - Lisa Laraine (4/13/2010 9:08 a.m.)
  - How do you know that from Ch. 1-12? (nfm) Adrian (4/12/2010 8:53 p.m.)
- distinguishing the much superior solicitude Stephanie (4/12/2010 3:25 p.m.)
  - In fact, a good judge of character Kathi (4/12/2010 7:24 p.m.)
    - far from suspecting that she was [] an object of some interest Stephanie (4/12/2010 9:25 p.m.)
  - In general, Merrie B. (4/12/2010 4:21 p.m.)
    - Merrie Cheryl (4/12/2010 4:38 p.m.)
      - oops! Merrie B. (4/13/2010 9:38 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions