Not at all

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Not at all Written by Barbara (1/24/2006 12:36 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, How funny was CoO supposed to be, originally?, penned by Line

I actually didn't have any impression that HW meant for this to be humourous in any way, other than the way his domestics speak and act, which he provided for comic relief from the horror.

Actually, as I was snickering my way through the first chapter, I was thinking that it is Jane Austen herself who conditioned me to laugh at this kind of thing.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

How funny was CoO supposed to be, originally? Line (1/23/2006 10:00 p.m.)

Willing suspension of disbelief Tate (1/24/2006 11:31 a.m.)
- You have a point there. Reeba (1/24/2006 5:14 p.m.)
Not at all Barbara (1/24/2006 12:36 a.m.)
- Very true Kelley B (1/24/2006 8:36 a.m.)
This is true LaurieBrittany (1/23/2006 10:35 p.m.)
- From "horror" to "horrid"... Delories (1/24/2006 7:04 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo