"The Monk" is indeed a nasty piece of work...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

"The Monk" is indeed a nasty piece of work... Written by Delories (3/8/2009 4:04 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, I would not think *The Monk* and *Udolpho*..., penned by Adrian

...as has been noted elsewhere on the board. Besides different kinds of perversion, there's icky stuff involving corpses and... anyway, it's probably on line if you really want to read it.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Ch.5: Novel-reading, women and morality Line (3/5/2009 3:01 p.m.)

A few other reasons why novels were women's domain Laraine (3/6/2009 3:04 p.m.)
- Interesting - thanks, Laraine! (nfm) Line (3/7/2009 10:28 a.m.)
- High and low novels... Eirene (3/7/2009 1:12 a.m.)
  - I would not think *The Monk* and *Udolpho*... Adrian (3/7/2009 12:42 p.m.)
    - The Monk...does sound worse than Udolpho (nfm) Eirene (3/8/2009 10:40 p.m.)
    - "The Monk" is indeed a nasty piece of work... Delories (3/8/2009 4:04 a.m.)
We know some things I think Patricia P (3/6/2009 1:40 p.m.)
- Thanks, Patricia! (nfm) Line (3/7/2009 9:43 a.m.)
How could Austen NOT like novels? Lynn (3/5/2009 8:44 p.m.)
- I know it doesn't make sense Line (3/6/2009 9:38 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo