Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


A few other reasons why novels were women's domain   Written by Laraine (3/6/2009 3:04 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Ch.5: Novel-reading, women and morality, penned by Line
Are you new?

At the time when the novel rose into its own, during the course of a man's education, he was taught to read and write in Latin and Greek. A woman was not.

A woman might have learned modern languages (though many did not), but they were generally not thought capable of the type of study it took to learn these "classical" languages, and one reason that women did not go to university was that they didn't have this necessary preparation.

These ideas lead to the impression that women could not handle "serious" learning and reading, and they were left to read these supposedly lighter, more fanciful stories. They were written in their own language, and wouldn't hurt a woman's feeble mind :)

I think that you could compare the attitudes about novels then to the attitudes today that many have about watching daytime dramas (soap operas).


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast