Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Oh dear!   Written by Robbin (3/3/2009 6:39 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, 'affected indifference', penned by Emmeline
Are you new?

I think you are right and it is real young ladies that show affected indifference in Ch. 5. I must say how dishonest of them. Not all is lost however. I think Catherine can be said to patronize another heroine in her defense of Udolpho unlike the usual heroine. Catherine also differs from novel heroines as her feelings about novels are far from disgust:

Yes, novels; for I will not adopt that ungenerous and impolitic custom so common with novel–writers, of degrading by their contemptuous censure the very performances, to the number of which they are themselves adding — joining with their greatest enemies in bestowing the harshest epithets on such works, and scarcely ever permitting them to be read by their own heroine, who, if she accidentally take up a novel, is sure to turn over its insipid pages with disgust. Alas! If the heroine of one novel be not patronized by the heroine of another, from whom can she expect protection and regard? (Ch. 5)

Thanks for reading. (;D)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast