Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


On novels.   Written by MandyN (4/25/2006 2:31 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Gothic vs. ordinary, penned by Heather L
Are you new?


Great post !

Pardon if I wasn't clear.
I discussed JA's Defence of the novel earlier but to clarify my view the first part of NA is a Defence of the novel , should have quoted from Ch. 5.

As usual, your explaination hits the nail on the head, Heather !

]Perhaps the best sort of novel reader can discern which parts of a charecter are the sensational, overblown details and recogzize the core of human nature inside- then apply that core to "reading" (understanding) people in real life.
Does that make any sense ?

As I see it the Tilneys are the best sort of novel readers.
Henry sees gothics as a 'good read'. He's an excellent reader for the escapism of Mrs Radcliffe's novels.
Yet I wonder if Henry considers the core of human nature in novels he reads and applies them to real life.

(In contrast, the Thorpes appear as 'readers' of the worst sort.)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast