That makes sense. Thanks, Kelly. :-) *nfm*

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

That makes sense. Thanks, Kelly. :-) *nfm* Written by Reeba (4/7/2006 4:14 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Two things I can think of:, penned by Kelley B

No further message

Rules of Conduct at the Upper Rooms circa 1813 JulieW (4/6/2006 10:36 a.m.)

I have been longing to read these. Reeba (4/6/2006 11:15 a.m.)
- Dacning was only JulieW (4/6/2006 11:38 a.m.)
Interesting rules on dancing Mary Ellen (4/6/2006 1:22 p.m.)
- I think your distinction JulieW (4/6/2006 2:29 p.m.)
- Possible context to one quirky rule *spoilers* for "Evelina& Catherine Anna (4/8/2006 9:35 p.m.)
A question Pennie (4/6/2006 10:29 p.m.)
- I noitced that too.......... JulieW (4/7/2006 5:29 a.m.)
  - Pardon me for this liberty… Robbin (4/7/2006 11:01 a.m.)
    - Whoa , ladies! JulieW (4/7/2006 2:32 p.m.)
      - Why was the rule for the ladies and not the gents? nfm   Jan (4/7/2006 3:10 p.m.)
        
        I dont know,Jan   JulieW (4/7/2006 3:34 p.m.)
        
        LOL! A cat fight in regency dress - how elegant! nfm   Jan (4/7/2006 4:09 p.m.)
        
        Ah.... is it about precedence?   Jan (4/7/2006 8:22 p.m.)
        
        Good point Jan! nfm :D   Robbin (4/8/2006 10:00 a.m.)
    - My guess too Melissa (4/7/2006 8:05 p.m.)
- A guess Heather L (4/7/2006 10:14 a.m.)
- Some more... Reeba (4/7/2006 2:20 p.m.)
  - Two things I can think of: Kelley B (4/7/2006 4:12 p.m.)
    - That makes sense. Thanks, Kelly. :-) *nfm* Reeba (4/7/2006 4:14 p.m.)
  - Also... Nicki (4/8/2006 9:09 a.m.)
    - I didn't think.. Reeba (4/8/2006 9:28 a.m.)
      - Not sure Nicki (4/8/2006 1:17 p.m.)
        
        I think you are right, Nicki. Reeba (4/8/2006 2:10 p.m.)
ladies Bettina (4/7/2006 3:46 a.m.)

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index