Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Edmund has a loosing hand   Written by Robbin (9/28/2010 7:05 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Everybody has trouble saying no, or taking a stand, penned by Tom P2
Are you new?

As I am now, I have no influence, I can do nothing: I have offended them, and they will not hear me; but when I have put them in good–humour by this concession, I am not without hopes of persuading them to confine the representation within a much smaller circle than they are now in the high road for. This will be a material gain. My object is to confine it to Mrs. Rushworth and the Grants.” (16)

I readily agree Edmund is ‘unwilling… to check a pleasure of Miss Crawford’s’ (7) or his own as it pertains to her but quitting the play is unlikely to stop Tom’s inviting their neighbors to audience the play. Actually I think Edmund could not do it without inviting disagreeable consequences. He has not the power to enforce any deal with Tom the later is not already disposed to oblige. It seems to me the threat to bring in any of “six young men within six miles of” (15) MP to play Anhalt was intended to force Edmund to do the deed himself and it and Miss Crawford’s newly formed scruples did the trick. However, as Edmund told Fanny (above) he also hoped agreeing to act would secure some influence with his brother about the size of the audience but it was not to be. I do not feel Tom was resolved to keep this promise when he made it:

Edmund… gave a hint of his hope as to the limitation of the audience, they [Maria & Tom] were ready, in the complaisance of the moment, to promise anything. (17)

It is true Edmund could have walked out when he learned:

‘…his brother, instead of being really guided by him as to the privacy of the representation, was giving an invitation to every family who came in his way’ (18)

However I feel if Edmund tried to leverage his brother to limit the audience by refusing to act it would only produce counter-leverage in the resurrection of Tom’s threat to solicit Charles Maddox or Tom Oliver or some other agreeable Oliver “wild to be admitted into our company” (15) to play the part of Anhalt. Tom and Edmund would be in the same positions in which they started and Edmund would still be greatly disadvantaged in the quarrel. Tom is still disinclined to heed his younger brother’s advice, Edmund remains without the power to thwart his older brother’s plans and unfortunately still has only one viable card to play (acting) when he actually needs two. One to prevent Tom’s exposing the family by bringing in an outsider to play Anhalt and one to prevent Tom’s exposing the family by inviting surrounding families to witness their folly. I think walking out of the production could only really be considered a good in reestablishing Edmund as a man behaving according to his principles. (;D)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast