Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


nurture v. nature question   Written by Karen G (9/27/2010 1:39 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Parents' responsibility., penned by Rachel G
Are you new?

It is still a puzzle to me, reading about the Bertrams, how they (with the exception of Edmund) seem so devoid of affection for their parents and so selfish. It does go back to a nurture v. nature question. And why is Edmund such an exception as well? I noted in another post that it seems the omniscient narrator treats Sir Thomas with the same gravity as his character actually has, and so many of his thoughts and opinions seems sensible and right. Yet, in execution those ideas turn completely arry. And even when Sir Thomas seems to even be making amends for conscious or unconscious neglect, such as when he talks with Maria and does give her an out with her engagement to Mr. Rushworth, Maria does not see the olive branch. They do not even see their father as a human being, it seems. Just a lawgiver, law enforcer, and constricter of freedom. I don't think MP does a very good job of making sense of the nurture v. nature question, especially comparing Edmund to the others.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast