Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Rears and Vices   Written by Bridget D (9/19/2010 5:15 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Not so shocking after all., penned by Rachel G
Are you new?

well, I am not sure that her words woudl not have raised an eyebrow, if she'd really been hinting at homosexuality...


Its true that Georgian and Regency societyt was in many ways very coarse - and that Victorianism was a reaction to all that.. But sitill the Bertrams were a fairly "prim and proper" family, very moral and well bred and I think that had they realised that Mary COULD have been referring to "nautical naughtiness" of a sexual kind, a shocked silence WOULD have descended. but I dont think that they did realise that. It was just "vices" in the general sense (not so sure about rears!! was that a reference to men with large bottoms who didn't do much work???"

And I think Edmund was a a bit shocked even by this milder pun.. but he overlooked it...


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast