crying for different reasons

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

crying for different reasons Written by Karen G (9/16/2010 2:40 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, still not sure E. hasn't also got a little nasty streak - dense, penned by Lis M

‘characteristic of or befitting an infant; babyish; childish’

While it is true Fanny cries a great deal, it's not all the time (Austen highlights those instances she does which makes it seems like all the time), and it's not for simple reason such as "I'm hungry", "I'm sick and not feeling well", "I'm not getting enough attention". Those I would imagine are the typical reason a baby cries. A baby doesn't cry because she is ashamed (a child might), or that she is mortified at others' views of her (such as her Aunt Norris), or that she is conscious she feels ungrateful for her uncle's generosity. Babies and very few children would cry for those reasons. And certainly, Fanny is not crying to bring attention to herself.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Mr. Rushworth! Carol (9/15/2010 12:14 a.m.)

Heavy Mr Rushworth Isabelle M (9/15/2010 2:07 p.m.)
- Heavy. Rachel G (9/15/2010 3:28 p.m.)
  - Oh, my! Erica (9/15/2010 8:23 p.m.)
  - According to Johnson - Heavy means... Christopher (9/15/2010 5:38 p.m.)
    - Fascinating! Tori Marie (9/16/2010 5:11 p.m.)
    - I wondered about it, too; thanks Christopher (nfm) Cathy Allen (9/16/2010 12:22 p.m.)
    - Thanks for the info! nfm Carol (9/15/2010 8:14 p.m.)
Edmund about Mr Rushworth Lis M (9/15/2010 2:37 a.m.)
- Edmund has a nasty streak? Robbin (9/15/2010 12:36 p.m.)
  - One might think... Karen G (9/16/2010 2:34 p.m.)
    - Edmund's own opinion, or a reflection of how his family judges? Tom P2 (9/24/2010 12:39 a.m.)
      - Stupid Bridget D (9/24/2010 1:08 a.m.)
    - True, but... Tori Marie (9/16/2010 5:16 p.m.)
      - It would be   Erica (9/16/2010 10:02 p.m.)
        
        If Edmund does not see Rushworth's lack of intelligence   Frances G (9/18/2010 1:35 a.m.)
        
        Does "not more than common sense" = "stupid"   Karen G (9/24/2010 12:20 p.m.)
        
        stupid   Bridget D (9/25/2010 1:51 a.m.)
        
        omniscient narrator   Karen G (9/25/2010 11:20 a.m.)
    - Not if it is true Robbin (9/16/2010 4:02 p.m.)
  - nasty and infantile Lis M (9/16/2010 3:40 a.m.)
    - Neither Mean or Infantile Robbin (9/16/2010 5:31 a.m.)
      - Another reason Edmund approves the idea... Karen G (9/16/2010 2:30 p.m.)
      - still not sure E. hasn't also got a little nasty streak - dense   Lis M (9/16/2010 10:17 a.m.)
        
        crying for different reasons   Karen G (9/16/2010 2:40 p.m.)
        
        Fanny and Edmund   Bridget D (9/17/2010 1:21 a.m.)
        
        "Stupid and insensitive"   MelissaJoy (9/18/2010 4:17 p.m.)
        
        Edmund   Bridget D (9/19/2010 3:26 a.m.)
        
        I feel the same way   BarbaraB (9/20/2010 3:30 p.m.)
        
        I don't see any any evidence   Ramya (9/17/2010 8:20 a.m.)
        
        Exactly.   Julie P. (9/18/2010 12:11 p.m.)
        
        Couldn't agree more   Erica (9/16/2010 10:10 p.m.)
        
        I agree and thank you! (:D) nfm   Robbin (9/16/2010 4:04 p.m.)
  - And why is common sense looked down upon? That is a AnnetteJ (9/15/2010 2:28 p.m.)
    - Common Sense Robbin (9/15/2010 7:43 p.m.)
      - You said that better than I did ;P (nfm) Nicki (9/16/2010 9:20 a.m.)
      - Agree nfm BarbaraB (9/15/2010 9:23 p.m.)
    - 'More' is perhaps the key word Nicki (9/15/2010 3:59 p.m.)
      - Mr. Rushworth lacks social awareness or "delicacy." jeffrey (9/15/2010 4:35 p.m.)
        
        Thanks to both of you! I think that is probably the case AnnetteJ (9/15/2010 5:07 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo