Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
Fastidiousness/Style
Written by BarbaraB
(8/25/2011 10:06 a.m.)
in consequence of the missive, to us they're precious, penned by Felicity S
Caroline, it seems, was appalled by it: “It is this incoherence that so alarms Caroline Austen, who is looking for a proper ‘transcript‘ of an elegant, composed mind. In her letters, Austen employs a jolting, frustrating style which disallows for subordination. Dashes casually break up endless paragraphs to signal fresh ‘matters‘ inappropriately joined, subjects as momentous as ‘a dead Baronet’ and as mundane as a dose of rhubarb....” When I first approached the reading of her letters, I never thought about the difference between them and her literary works, they were written for such dissimilar reasons. However, I have noted that her beginning letters use the dashes less frequently and haphazardly. I flipped to Cassandra’s letters in the back and she employs the dash as well. JA was not writing for the public and would be shocked, I’m sure, that we are all reading and enjoying them still. It was obviously a convenient way for her to correspond with frequency mainly with her ‘best friend‘ and it worked for them. I have never had a problem with it. Ironically, it fits rather tidily in with our modern forms of abbreviated, sometimes staccato methods of correspondence when emailing, texting, electronic chatting, etc. |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
