Impenetrable to us but not to Casandra?

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Impenetrable to us but not to Casandra? Written by Deborah Julia (9/19/2007 2:05 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Tone, penned by JulieW

JA's letters are a valuable primary historical source, straight from the horse's mouth so to speak, but yes, sometimes to us her comments, throw away one liners are head scratchers. It's doubly hard not having Casandra's letters to help us. How I wish we could defy the laws of physics, travel back in time and ask JA "what did you mean by that?" No doubt we would get short shrift from Jane, LOL

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Letter 33: An easier journey? Line (9/18/2007 7:54 p.m.)

Sarcasm? JoAnn (9/18/2007 11:14 p.m.)
- Tone JulieW (9/19/2007 5:04 a.m.)
  - Agree, sometimes... Moni (9/19/2007 10:01 a.m.)
  - Impenetrable to us but not to Casandra? Deborah Julia (9/19/2007 2:05 p.m.)
    - If only she'd used emoticons! ;-) (nfm) JoAnn (9/20/2007 12:23 p.m.)
..much more easy and agreeable than my journey down. Reeba (9/19/2007 4:24 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo