Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


No, we discussesd this slightly in teh first GR of the Letters.   Written by JulieW (9/18/2007 2:47 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, (Only slightly) tangential ethical question, penned by JoAnn
Are you new?

As an amateur historian, and someone who is terribly interested in this period and JA, I really am glad these lettees ,and letters like them exist. I really would read a shopping list left behind by JA.

I think they shed great lights into her ife and work.

However, this is what is left. If Cassandra destroyed any of the lettrs,she didnt destroy them all and by the time of her death interest in JA was becoming greater,so she would have known IMHO that there would also be interst in the letters and the family.What I'm saying is that she could have destroyed it alll, but she didnt.I take that as some sort of tacit permission to read tehm.

But I understandsome of your sqeamishness

The choice is yours I suppose.If you dont want to read them because of your concerns about readinga private correspondence, then the answer is simple- dont. ;-)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast